Great bunch of guys you lot are, Jesus H. Christ. I'm not sure if there has been a thread that's bashed WWE anymore. Here's the thing, each WrestleMania can be singled out as a stand-alone event, with each card analysed to Kingdom Come. In which case, they may not be as good. However, no WWE pay-per-view, especially prior to this current degrading era we find ourselves in now, was ever a stand-alone event. You claim WrestleMania I was terrible, yet fail to see that it's purpose was to help wrestling get over in the mainstream. What did it do? It made this company internationally famous. The wrestling wasn't brilliant, but it has a lasting legacy. WrestleMania III was terrible? WrestleMania VI was terrible? Arguably two of the best known events, featuring two Hulk Hogan matches (you know, the company's only real over guy in the mainstream at the time), and a match that, for sixteen years, was the best in the events history. Back then, WrestleMania and wrestling wasn't necessarily about making wrestling bigger and bigger, but it could only use it's viable assets (Hogan) to do so anyway. The Attitude Era sucked? But WrestleMania X-Seven was perfect? Yeah, that match with the APA and Tazz vs. Right to Censor was a classic. Jeez.

I'll admit, some of the past few WrestleMania cards have disappointed, some in more ways than one, however I do think they've delivered as much as they could in the ring. In my opinion, from WrestleMania XIX to WrestleMania 22, they did the events right. Yeah, even WrestleMania XX. It was a bit like a classic Mania with the stacked card.

Since WrestleMania XXV, it's really been hit or miss. As much as I love this company, I'm in no rush to see WrestleMania XXVII again. Is is because of The Miz? No, it's because the event was lackluster. WrestleMania XXVI had some good moments, some actually underrated moments, and WrestleMania XXVIII delivered. Was it anticlimactic? 80,000 people in Miami certainly didn't think so. Other than the main event, WrestleMania 29 wasn't awful. The Shield's match was good, CM Punk vs. The Undertaker was match of the night, and even Brock Lesnar vs. Triple H was good.

This is all very subjective, and some comparisons are beyond ridiculous. You cannot compare WrestleMania 2 with WrestleMania XXVII, just like you cannot compare Fast and Furious with The Tooth Fairy. They may be similar in ways, but we're very different in direction and aspirations. I'll admit, some arguments may be true, but some guys sound like they're here just to bitch. If you are, and you've hated wrestling for 30 years, just leave. Nothing will ever change, will it?