So Batman can dodge bullets but bond can't dodge thrown object's? That has to be the most ridiculous thing ive read on these forums. Congratulations on that. Yes Batman has disarmed opponents before but as shotaro rightly pointed out Bond was more then capable at eluding OddJobb's Bowler hat along with throwing knives in moonraker and harpoons in Thunderball. I would say both cancel each other out in that regard but if i was a betting man i would say bullet beats batarang, especially a bullet fired by James Bond of all people.

Another point that annoyed me was GrandSword suggesting that it was "The Daniel Craig version" fighting this battle. Daniel Craig isn't fighting here and neither are Sean Connery, Pierce Brosnan, Val Kilmer or George Clooney. It's the characters of James Bond and Batman fighting not the actors who portrayed them. You wouldn't say it's James earl Jones VS Eric Bana in a fight between Darth Vader and The Hulk so don't do it here you numpties.

It's a shame this battle has to happen with both men simply dropped into a battlefield as the playboy lifestyles of Bruce Wayne and James Bond could have lead to some interesting scenes at a party in Gotham.

As to who would win it's pretty tough to call. Both are skilled at hand to hand combat and both have a wide array of gadgets to call on when necessary. Say what you will Bond will be able to move a little bit quicker then Batman due to not having to wear the armor Batman wears. I think the key thing here though is that Batman doesn't kill his enemies while Bond is a cold blooded efficient killer. As long as Bond is still alive he has a chance as we have seen time and time again.

Im going to wait until ive heard all the arguments first before i vote but im leaning ever so slightly towards a victory for bond. Batman nearly had the win but a watch laser to the eye was too much for our caped crusader.